THE INTELLIGENCE HORIZON

AI timelines, under review.

Track AGI, ASI and a conditional extinction pathway. Explore the assumptions and the evidence—not a predetermined future.

01 / SCENARIO EXPLORER

Choose an assumption set

2026205020752100CONDITIONAL HORIZON2042IF THIS PATHWAY OCCURSA CALENDAR, NOT A PROBABILITY
REFERENCE CASE / MODEL v2.0

From general intelligence
to a high-stakes frontier.

Fast progress continues, but reliability, infrastructure and deployment constraints still matter.

Illustrative scenarios—not calibrated forecasts. The dates are editor-selected assumptions. The final milestone assumes a catastrophic pathway occurs; humanity may survive indefinitely.

Inspect the model and its limits
01 / AGI
2031selected scenario year

Artificial general intelligence

20282042 assumption range

A system that reliably matches a competent human across most economically useful cognitive tasks, including unfamiliar multi-step work with limited supervision. Not one benchmark and not necessarily embodied intelligence.

02 / ASI
2035selected scenario year

Artificial superintelligence

20302055 assumption range

A system substantially beyond the best human experts across nearly all cognitive domains, including scientific research and strategic planning. Narrow superhuman performance does not qualify.

03 / Extinction pathway
2042selected scenario year

Conditional extinction

20322085 assumption range

Human extinction substantially caused by AI. Dates are conditional illustrations of an ASI-enabled loss-of-control pathway, assuming extinction occurs. Other pathways could occur before ASI; survival indefinitely is also possible.

A range of futures, not a deadline

Ranges are not statistical confidence intervals
202620582090
AGI
2031
ASI
2035
Extinction pathway
2042

AGI does not imply ASI. ASI does not imply extinction. These are separate, conditional transitions.

LAST COLLECTIONSep 21, 2026, 08:13 PM UTC
EVIDENCE COVERAGE11 reviewed / 240 sources
EXTINCTION PROBABILITYNot estimated
02 / THE EVIDENCE DESK

What’s shaping the outlook

Original sources, visible limitations.
Capability gains and protective signals both count.

240 results
OpenAIAwaiting review

Building standards for the next phase of AI

Newly collected source. No analytical claim or forecast effect has been assigned. Open the original to inspect the evidence.

03 / NO BLACK BOX

Uncertainty is
part of the model.

A useful warning system should show its assumptions, not hide them behind a precise-looking countdown.

Experimental scenario model · v2.0
Where do the dates come from?

They are explicit editorial starting assumptions, not expert consensus or an AI-derived probability forecast. The reference set starts with AGI in 2031, four years from AGI to ASI, and seven more years to the conditional extinction pathway. Fast takeoff uses 2028 + 2 + 3 years; slower progress uses 2040 + 10 + 15. Range endpoints pair earlier AGI with shorter lags. They are not percentiles. A minimum one-year gap between stages is a simplifying assumption.

What can move the clock?

Daily collection gathers allowlisted RSS feeds. An optional model reviews up to 12 excerpts per run with source quotations and limitations. Review is not independent fact-checking. By default, proposals do not change dates. Experimental automatic application requires explicit server configuration, a high-confidence assessment, a known recent publication date and a new event. Extinction-lag proposals are never automatically applied.

AGI-date and ASI-lag adjustments are capped at two months each per run and five years each cumulatively. An AGI shift propagates downstream; displayed ASI and conditional extinction can therefore move four months in a run or ten years cumulatively. Caps are engineering choices, not scientific calibration. At most one nonzero event per publisher per run is eligible; semantic event deduplication is best-effort.

Why isn’t there a risk percentage?

No validated method converts current news into a numerical probability of human extinction. The previous version’s percentage and fixed countdown were unsupported and have been removed. A faster timeline is not the same thing as a higher probability of extinction.

What’s missing?

RSS coverage is incomplete; feeds may lag or fail. Automated analysis sees excerpts, not full articles, and can misinterpret them or miss events. arXiv papers are not necessarily peer reviewed. Developer benchmarks need independent corroboration. Unforeseen breakthroughs, plateaus, policy changes and non-ASI pathways are outside this simple model. No finite range excludes “never.”

04 / OPERATIONAL TRANSPARENCY

Behind the updates

No silent fallback to “live.”
Collection, analysis and storage have separate states.

Source health

Feeds are checked by the scheduled collector, not by visits to this page.

OpenAI Feed read successfully.
ok
METR Feed read successfully.
ok
Google DeepMind Feed read successfully.
ok
arXiv · AI Feed read successfully.
ok
arXiv · Security Feed read successfully.
ok

Update record

Persistent storage
Connected
Last attempt
Sep 21, 2026, 08:13 PM UTC
Analysis state
disabled
Last review
Sep 21, 2026, 05:30 PM UTC
Review model
Editorial baseline only

Default deployment schedule: daily, 11:00 UTC. Vercel Hobby may deliver within that hour. An open page checks for a saved snapshot every five minutes.

Recent collection history

  1. updated · 229 new

    Evidence collected. Automated review is not configured; new items have no forecast effect.

    Cumulative: AGI 0 mo / ASI lag 0 mo / final lag 0 mo